Whatever the driving force, the backlash to legislation from Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) that would have sold off 3.3 million acres of public land in 10 Western states was swift and fierce. Outrage erupted on Facebook and Twitter, advocacy groups urged supporters to bombardtheir congressional representatives phone lines, and a petition opposing the sale or transfer of public landsdrew tens of thousands of signatures.
The first takeaway is that the squeaky wheel still gets the grease, saidLand Tawney, the president and CEO of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, a Montana-based nonprofit dedicated to protecting public lands and preserving Americas tradition of hunting and fishing.
That Chaffetz could be swayed on this issue is notable. The chair of the House Oversight Committee has shown little backbonein his dealings with the Trump administration,opting not to pursue an investigationinto former national security adviserMichael Flynnsties to Russia. Nor has he seemed to care much about what his voters think, claiming thatpaid, out-of-state protestershadinfiltrated the crowdof angry constituents at a February town hall.
It was hunting and fishing advocates, however, who finally managed to get to Chaffetz.But Tawney and other public land advocates who rallied against his measure recognize that while they won this fight, the war is far from over. And they are prepared to stand firmly against what they view as a threat to national heritage.
For Tawny, a fifth-generation Montanan, access to land is as important as the guns he hunts with in the field.This issue is our second Second Amendment, Tawney said.Any attack on public lands is a non-starter for us.
The political battle over federal lands is nothing new. But with President Donald Trump in the White House and Republicans in control of both chambers of Congress,the GOP has a golden opportunity to make its move.On day one of this Congress, Republicansapproved a rules changemaking it easier to sell off large swaths of the more than 640 million acres of land the federal government owns, including national parks. The change fits snugly into the partys 2016 platform, which called fortransferring control of federal lands to states and opening public lands for increased oil and mineral production.
Then came Chaffetzs unambiguous bill to sell off several million acres of land he said had been deemed to serve no purpose for taxpayers.
Chaffetz had introduced the measure every year since 2010, but this time was different he had a unified Republican government and a clear party platform to back him up.
The introduction on Jan. 24 provoked outrage from conservationists, hunters, anglers and outdoor enthusiasts, who have labeled Chaffetz an anti-public lands congressman.
Alan Rowsome, senior government relations director for The Wilderness Society, compared the bill to driving a locomotive over the American peopleand our wild natural heritage.
It wasnt just in Utah, either. On Jan. 30,more than 1,000 people turned outfor a pro-public lands rally in Helena,Montana.Two days later, hundreds of demonstrators Republicans and Democrats converged on the state capitol in New Mexico.
Kayje Booker, state policy director for the Montana Wilderness Association, told HuffPost that the turnout at their rally was double what organizers were expecting.And while the Chaffetz bill was among the talking points, the rallys main purpose was to demonstrate the level of bipartisan support for public lands protection.
At no point were we like, Well have a rally and Chaffetz will pull his bill, she laughed.
But on Feb. 2, the congressman did just that. In an Instagram post including a photo of Chaffetz dressed in hunting camouflage, he noted that he is a proud gun owner, hunter and love our public lands. While defending the bills land sales, he acknowledged thatgroups I support and care about fear it sends the wrong message.
I hear you and HR 621 dies tomorrow, he wrote.
I am withdrawing HR 621. I’m a proud gun owner, hunter and love our public lands. The bill would have disposed of small parcels of lands Pres. Clinton identified as serving no public purpose but groups I support and care about fear it sends the wrong message. The bill was originally introduced several years ago. I look forward to working with you. I hear you and HR 621 dies tomorrow. #keepitpublic #tbt
Its not clear whether it was one specific group or the collective outcry that pushed Chaffetz to have a change of heart. But the bill and its subsequent death appear to have given advocates new energy.
In an interview with the Outdoor Industry Association, Tania Lown-Hecht, communications director for Outdoor Alliance, another public lands advocacy nonprofit, said the success in defeating Chaffetzs bill is a great bellwether.
It tells us that people are paying good attention to policy right now and they are not afraid to share their voices, often loudly and passionately, she said.
Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whoslammed Chaffetzin a statement on Feb. 1, told HuffPost that Chaffetzs decision to withdraw the measure just nine days after introducing it came as a shock a welcome one. What was not surprising, he said, was the publics volatile reaction to the measure.
A lot of people who maybe didnt take this threat very seriously in the past suddenly woke up and went, Wow, my national forests that I hunt, jog, camp on that could go away, Heinrich told HuffPost. I dont care whether youre an independent, a Democrat or a Republican, if you live in the West, chances are thats a big part of your life.
Brad Brooks, the Idaho deputy regional director of The Wilderness Society, echoed that sentiment. People from all walks of life, and from both sides of the aisle, had a visceral reaction to the bold, in-your-face language, he told HuffPost. And the bill, he said, became a kind of unifying rallying cry for protecting public lands.
Advocacy groups are now reflecting on their win and turning their focus to other proposals. Its unlikely Republicans will stop writing bills to sell or transfer federal lands, although they may opt for less brazen, more subtle language in the future.
Topping advocacy groups currentlist of targetsis HR 622, another Chaffetz measure, which seeks to terminate the law enforcement functions of the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management and hand over authority to local departments.
Heinrich described that proposed bill as a gift to poachers and drug runners.
Chaffetzs office did not respond to HuffPosts request for comment.
Booker said conservationists now face a new opportunity and challenge: maintaining the current level of engagement and enthusiasm. The energy is there, the momentum is there, she told HuffPost. But then how do you harness that for a series of actions?
Sportsmen are also ready to hold lawmakers accountable,Tawney said.
I dont think theyll be fatigued with this issue, he said.
Brooks stressed the importance of remaining vigilant to prevent the privatization of some of Americas most cherished protected areas: I think that people know were not messing around anymore when it comes to anti-public lands bills in Congress.