Does Silicon Valley have a moral responsibility to stop developing robots?

The debate about the impact of new technology, particularly AI, on society continues to rage.

Last month, for example, the current front runner to replace Jerry Brown as Californian Governor in 2018,Gavin Newsom traditionally one of Silicon Valleys most vocal supporters warnedgraduating computer science students at UC Berkeley about the duty to exercise their moral authority to improve society.

This is code red, a firehose, a tsunami, thats coming our way, he said about the impact of new technology on jobs and inequality. So is Newsom right? Is the job of entrepreneurs and technologists, in his words, to exercise their moral authority?

To answer this question, and to talk more generally about the impact of AI on employment, I sat down with the co-director of the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy,Andrew McAfee.

One of the worlds leading authorities on the economic consequences of new technology, McAfee is also the co-author of the 2014 bestsellerThe Second Machine Ageand the just publishedMachine, Platform, Crowd.

Three years ago, IinterviewedMcAfee and his co-author, the MIT professorErik Brynjolfsson, about the connection between digital technology and jobs. So whats changed since 2014, I asked McAfee about his findings in his new book. What has surprised him most about developments over the last three years?

On the one hand, McAfee admits, We all underestimate the pace of progress in the sense that things have changed much faster and more dramatically than he ever imagined. But on the other hand, he confesses, he admits to being surprised by the surprising number of jobs that have been created by all this new technology.

These jobs may not always be great, he admits. But they exist. Thus far, at least, then, we have been spared Gavin Newsoms tsunami of technological unemployment. McAfees biggest regret lies in what he see as the failure over the last three years of public policy to get ready for the oncoming storm.

None of the suggestions laid out in The Second Machine Age liberalizing immigration policy or investment in infrastructure, education and research have been pursued. And so, McAfee warns, we may today be even more vulnerable to the darker economic consequences of the digital revolution.

Should Silicon Valley exercise its moral authority to stop developing this job-killing technology? Here McAfee is unequivocal. Absolutely not, he says. Over the next fifty years, he acknowledges, the economy will become massively automated, but at the same time society will have had half a century to adapt itself to the march of the robots.

McAfee ultimately remains an optimist. Things are going to work out okay in the long-run, he promises. In the end, we will be able to control the tsunami that is coming our way.

Many thanks to the folks at theGreater Providence Chamber of Commercefor their help in producing this interview.

Read more: https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/16/does-silicon-valley-have-a-moral-responsibility-to-stop-developing-robots/

The Swift is a programmable robotic arm for the masses

As a child I always lusted after the Armatron robotic arm. Oh, the amazing things I would have done! I could have assembled miniature cars! Pinched my sister remotely! Gently squashed bugs to paste! But, alas, the Armatron was too expensive and I never got one.

Now that Im old and wizened I can finally get one. Or at least something like it.

The Swift by UFactory is a crowdfunded robotic arm that promises fun, frolic and programmable robotic interaction for about $300 for early-bird models. There are two versions the standard Swift with a louder DC model and the Pro unit with a more accurate stepper motor and they can be used to perform tricks like laser etching, light painting and simple assembly. Its programmable using UFactorys Scratch-like programming language and you can even move the arm manually and it will recreate your motions.

They plan on shipping in May and the UFactory and their UArm team have already shipped more complex arms that have been used to open potato chip bags and, inexplicably, tickle a poop emoji.

1-10%e7%94%a8%e6%88%b7%e8%af%81%e8%a8%80

emojicenter-gif-poo-tickle

The most complete package costs $499 and includes a gripper, laser and 3D printer head. While all of this looks too good to be true and since its a crowdfunding campaign the buyer should beware darn it if this doesnt tickle that little nugget in my brain that always wanted a robot friend. Armatron, youre dead to me.

Read more: https://techcrunch.com/2017/02/08/the-swift-is-a-programmable-robotic-arm-for-the-masses/

Augmented reality makes prototyping easy on Shapers Origin CNC machine

Innovations in 3D printing have done their part to inspire maker-culture. We print, or at-least try to print, drones, human organs, and even medications. Additive techniques are practical and accessiblefor much of the prototyping process. However, just because we can print synthetic drugs with 3D printers, doesnt mean we can print something as simple as a walnut radio.

Shaper, a San Francisco based hardware startup, is putting time and money into making CNC, or Computer Numerical Control, prototyping as easy as printing on a MakerBot. Accomplishing this is no easy task, and the Shaper team has had to implement technologies far outside the experience of most mechanical engineers.

Origin, Shapers first product, leverages computer vision and augmented reality to take the learning curve out of CNC machining. But before we dive too deep into the innovations this small team has been able to come up with, lets first make sure we understand prototyping 101.

ShaperShaper CEO Joe Hebenstreit explains that there are two fundamental ways to build something. You can start with a structure, lets say an ice block, and carve away material to create beauty or you can start with nothing and assemble small parts to create something greater than the sum of each part, like a house. Constructing a house is a great metaphor for additive construction. 3D printers additively print layers of material until they create an object. CNC, on the other hand, is a subtractive process where an object is cut down to a useful shape. Typically techniques like aluminum fabrication and wood carving require subtractive rather than additive construction.

To cut an object with CNC you typically have to operate within a fixed workspace with fixed materials, much like a traditional printer, so that the machine can interpret designs. Origin however can operate in any workspace with a wide-variety of materials including wood, carbon fiber, and vinyl. Almost any flat surface can become a workspacebecause Origin has a camera on itsback that is consistently searching for a specialty ShaperTape. The tape, included with the purchase of the machine, enables the cutting head to contextualize itself movement is with respect to the tape.Shaper

With this baseline information, all it takes is a little bit of computer vision and some math and you can visualize cuts in augmented reality. Hebenstreit was previously product design lead and engineering manager, for Googles Project Glass where he dealt with similar augmented reality challenges. In addition to Hebenstreit, early prototypes of the device were fabricatedat MIT by co-founders Alec Rivers and Ilan Moyer.

The Origin has a touchscreen attached behind the cutter that simulates the cutting space for the user. When someone finishes a design on the computer, they simply drag and drop it to a Shaper folder that is accessible from the device. Once open, producing a prototype is as easy as a childrens coloring book.

All you have to do to make a precision cut is drag Origin along the virtual lines and you will be able to replicate CNC parts made by traditional machines that can cost tens of thousands of dollars. As if that wasnt easy enough, the cutting head is mounted on motors that will autocorrect mistakes in positioning. Rather than line up every cut perfectly, all you need to do is get within a few inches and the machine can automateeven the most intricate cuts.

Shaper

Shaper raiseda $3 million dollar seed round that included participation from Eniac Ventures, SOSV, Founders Guild, Comet Labs, and Root Ventures. The company has plans to bring in even more capital to expedite production and continued research and development.

Origin will goon sale at9 a.m. PSTon Tuesday, August 23rd. The handheld hardwarewill sellfor $1,500 for early pre-sale buyers before ultimately retailing for $2,099.

Read more: https://techcrunch.com/2016/08/22/shapers-ar-makes-cnc-prototyping-easy/

Soon Youll Swallow Origami Pills and Get Magnetic Colonoscopies

This might be a tough pill to swallow, but the future of medicine is all about ingestible sensors. Things like cameras to scope out your bowels and electronics that detect if youve taken your medicine (recently FDA-approved, by the way).

Also, swallowable origami. Researchers at MIT have developed a frozen gizmo made of pig intestine that you drop down the hatch. As it thaws in your stomach, it unfolds. Using a magnetic field, a doctor could theoretically lead the device to something youve gone and swallowed but really shouldnt havebatteries aren’t as tasty as they lookand hurry the offending object out of your system.

Theoretically. The researchers have so far only tested the device on a model of a pig stomach. But its a fascinating glimpse into the future of incision-free surgery, one propelled in large part by magnets.

So a doctor has guided the battery out of you. (Oh and no, not the way it came in. The other more involved route.) But the battery may have leaked and stuck to the lining of your stomach. Luckily, as the pill technology improves, so will the capabilities. “In the second phase there would be another capsule you send to patch the wound or deliver medicine,” says MITs Daniela Rus, who developed the origami pill. No need to cut the patient open. Aces.

Aside from traditional surgery being rather traumatic, doctors also have the problem of anesthesia. Namely, its best avoided. And that has inspired a similar experiment to the origami pill: the next-gen magnetic colonoscopy.

I dont reckon I need to explain to you how a colonoscopy works, other than to say doctors have to knock you out for it. “The problem is, not everybody can get sedated,” says roboticist Pietro Valdastri of Vanderbilt University. “Its a very powerful drug if youve got a heart problem.”

So Valdastri is developing—with funding from the National Institutes of Health—a colonoscopy robot that uses the origami pills principle of magnetic guidance. Instead of pushing a tube through a patient’s digestive system, the doctor would pull it through the intestines using a magnet on a robotic arm outside the patients body (the device is equipped with a camera, just like a regular colonoscope). This eliminates the discomfort of forcefully pushing the colonoscope through—and the need for anesthesia. Valdastri hopes to have it in human trials in three years, so a very magnetic colonoscopy could be in your near future.

Back at the other end of the body, a company called Proteus Digital Health has skipped all the folding and magnets and developed teeny-tiny sensors for pills because, well, medicating is hard. Fewer than 50 percent of patients the world over are taking their medications correctly. The rest of you clowns are misusing your medicines. “As they go through this therapy that’s often months or years or the rest of their lives,” says George Savage, chief medical officer of Proteus. “There’s no feedback to tell them if they’re doing a good job or not, if the therapy is helping them or not, or just what to do next.”

Proteus is out to end all that. Its FDA-approved sensor, measuring just 1 mm by 1 mm by 300 microns, easily fits in a pill. Once that pill hits a patients stomach, the sensor pings a patch on skin, which in turn beams the data to a smartphone app. Thats extremely valuable information, both to help forgetful patients keep accurate tabs on their dosages, as well as their doctors.

Consider the case of a patient thats a habitual double-upper, forgetting to take a pill in the morning and instead taking two at night. They may tell their doctor theyre using all their medication, and indeed they are, but this regimen is problematic. There’s no way to address this patient’s problem unless you see the pattern, says Savage. With sensor-packed pills, the physician is able to say, Oh, I see what you’re doing. That can be dangerous.

It aint got the theatrics of swallowable origami, but it is a taste of a future where a pill is far more than a pill. Not that you should start eating batteries anytime soon. Or ever, really. Lets say ever.

Read more: http://www.wired.com/2016/05/soon-youll-swallow-origami-pills-get-magnetic-colonoscopies/