The ‘Ali summit’: a turning point in sports’ fight against injustice

In 1967, athletes put their weight behind Muhammad Ali after he refused to be drafted. Fifty years later, NFL players are again taking a political stand

In 1962, as a cornerback for the American Football Leagues Boston Patriots, Walter Beach rallied his fellow black players there were about five for a discussion.

The topic was what to do about a forthcoming exhibition game against the Houston Oilers that was scheduled to be played in New Orleans. As was custom and law in most of the south at the time, the team accommodations were to be segregated. Promoters planned to house the black players from both teams at a black-owned motel, and white players from both teams at a hotel two miles away. We were all in agreement that we didnt want to participate in it, Beach said.

The players, led by Beach, asked the team to simply allow them to fly down and fly back the day of the match rather than submit to the indignities of Jim Crow the name given to the laws enacted by southern states to legally enforce segregation after the civil war.

The team did buy Beach a plane ticket, he recalled: a ticket home. He was cut.

Five years later, retired, he found himself back at the intersection of activism and athletics. The boxing heavyweight champion of the world, Muhammad Ali, was facing intense public backlash, not to mention the possibility of jail time and having his titles stripped, over his refusal to be drafted for the Vietnam war.

Muhammad
Muhammad Ali, flanked by basketball players Bill Russell and Lew Alcindor (Kareem Abdul-Jabbar). Photograph: Robert Abbott Sengstacke/Getty Images

In the midst of that uproar, the Cleveland Browns running back Jim Brown, who had just retired as the NFLs leading rusher, decided to call Ali and other prominent, vocal black athletes to a meeting. Beach, who had become close with Brown during their time together on the Browns, was invited to attend. None of us had any idea of trying to change Alis mind. The meeting was there to support his position, Beach said.

The meeting was held at the offices of the Negro Industrial Economic Union, a black empowerment organization that Brown himself had founded and had branches in other major US black hubs. After the meeting, which included a number of prominent athletes such as the Boston Celtics Bill Russell, the UCLA center Lewis Alcindor (who would later change his name to Kareem Abdul-Jabbar) and the Washington running back Bobby Mitchell a celebrated picture (at top) was snapped by journalists, as the stars put their weight behind Ali. Also invited, and pictured, was the Cleveland attorney Carl Stokes, who later that year would become mayor of the city the first black man to be elected to that office any major US city.

I felt with Ali taking the position he was taking, and with him losing the crown, and with the government coming at him with everything they had, that we as a body of prominent athletes could get the truth and stand behind Ali and give him the necessary support, Brown told the Cleveland Plain Dealer in 2012.

Now, just over 50 years after the meeting, which came to be known as the Muhammad Ali summit, its hard to ignore the parallels with the sudden resurgence of solidarity over social issues among black athletes. After a long chill from the 1980s through the 2000s, a number of factors, including Black Lives Matter and the protest movement authored by Colin Kaepernick, have brought that attitude roaring back.

Shut up and play football

Eli
Eli Harold, Colin Kaepernick and Eric Reid kneel in protest. Photograph: Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images

Not all the athletes gathered necessarily shared Alis feelings about Vietnam or would have done the same in his shoes. In fact, reports from the meeting suggest the discussion several times became heated and emotional. What they all wanted to reinforce when it was over, though, was that black athletes had the right to use their profile to speak up and speak out, and shouldnt be limited to their exploits on the court or the field or in the ring.

It was very important that you let people understand that youre more than a football player. Football is what I did, it wasnt who I was. Muhammad Ali was a boxer. Thats what he did. That wasnt who he was, Beach said.

Cue up to the present, and athletes are rejecting that compartmentalizing from fans all over again. People told me to shut up and play football, the Cleveland Browns wide receiverAndrew Hawkins told Slate in 2016. But what they dont realize is [these issues are] more important to me than what anybodys public perception of me is when I give my opinion.

Hawkins was one of the players who triggered the new wave of athlete protests, which predated Kaepernicks campaign, by wearing a shirt over his game jersey in 2014 that demanded justice for Tamir Rice and John Crawford, both black males shot by police while holding toy guns. Even before that, in 2012, the Miami Heat took a team photo in black hoodies as a tribute to the Florida teenager Trayvon Martin, an unprecedented move at the time.

But none of these Black Lives Matter inspired-efforts by athletes carried quite the same impact as what Colin Kaepernick, the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback, started in August 2016 when he began sitting, and then kneeling, for the national anthem in protest against police violence. Kaepernicks actions spurred the same type of vitriol and the same wave of solidarity that Ali generated all those years ago.

There hasnt been a moment where youve had a photo op that came to that, where you have had a photo of Colin Kaepernick surrounded by LeBron James and Michael and Martellus Bennett, Gregg Popovich and so on, but de facto youve had the same thing, said the Columbia Journalism School professor Samuel Freedman. Theres really been a rallying around [Kaepernick].

The rallying, timid at first, peaked after Kaepernick became the object of Donald Trumps abuse late last month, when Trump, without naming him, suggested the quarterback was a son of a bitch at an Alabama rally for his refusal to stand for the national anthem. It was a popular sentiment with the Trump supporters in attendance, and with white Americans in general, according to polling.

But Trumps ire only managed to make the protests more popular. Increasingly, the kneeling protests have become adopted not just in the NFL, but among various soccer clubs, the WNBA, and youth sports teams, all while Kaepernick remains apparently toxic to NFL owners and the GMs who decide which players make the roster.

Thus, the once (briefly) best-paid QB in the NFL has become equal parts folk hero and pariah in much the same way Ali polarized Americans during the 1960s. Kaepernick is the only player currently, and maybe ever, to have jersey sales in the leagues top 40 while not even signed to a team. Indeed, his jersey has come to be more associated with black consciousness and activism than football, with many non-fans of his former team, or even the game, seeking it out, mirroring a broader trend among his overall fanbase.

A courageous, prophetic, self-sacrificial act

Activists
Activists protest in support of Colin Kaepernick. Photograph: M Stan Reaves/Rex/Shutterstock

In 1962, the season after his unceremonious dismissal from the Patriots, Beach caught on with the Cleveland Browns where he met Brown and he said his experience was much the same. He said the team held him for years in a sort of roster limbo: placing him on waivers, which would allow another team to sign him, and then retracting the waivers when another team tried to.

Beach is convinced this roster trickery was intended to achieve one purpose alone. I was a liability. I was one of those individuals that struggled against racism all the time. They wanted to blackball me and thats precisely what they doing to Kaepernick.

Kaepernick filed suit against the NFL earlier this week, accusing the leagues owners of colluding to deny him employment due to his polarizing demonstration.

Beach also sued. And won. He had years of service added to his pension on the grounds that, had the team allowed him to sign on elsewhere, he could have played longer.

But what remains to be seen is whether the energy that players have collected in the Trump era can translate into something as unified in message as the Ali Summit, or even more. If it does, players like Kaepernick may never have to worry about whether their vocal stances on social issues will leave them unemployed.

I think the symbolic points been made, and I think the open question is what the players do with the social power that theyve achieved, said Freedman, who wrote the book Breaking the Line, about the intersection of college football and the civil rights movement.

Last week, the Los Angeles Chargers tackle Russell Okung proposed essentially a 21st-century summit, allowing players to unite behind a single narrative.

I am convinced that we will never make progress if we do not find a way to come together and take action that represents the will of the players, he wrote in an open letter to his colleagues.

As Kaps message has now been distorted, co-opted and used to further divide us along the very racial lines he was highlighting, we as players have a responsibility to come together and respond collectively.

Okung said he had initially been skeptical of Kaepernicks tactics but wrote: There is now no doubt in my mind that what he did last season was a courageous, prophetic, self-sacrificial act that has captivated a nation and inspired a powerful movement.

If I had his cellphone number, I would tell him that.

If what hes proposing comes to fruition, and if history is any guide, maybe hell get to tell him in person instead.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/oct/23/colin-kaepernick-muhammad-ali-summit-sports-activism

Sikh Coalition wants case of man shot in arm investigated as hate crime

FBI to help investigation after victim of Washington state incident says man who shot him wore a mask and yelled at him to get out of my country

A Sikh man from the suburbs of Seattle said a gunman approached him as he worked on his car in his driveway and told him to go back to your own country, before shooting him in the arm, authorities said.

Indias foreign minister, Sushma Swaraj, identified the victim on Twitter early on Sunday, saying: I am sorry to know about the attack on Deep Rai, a US national of Indian origin.

She said she had spoken to Rais father, who told her Rai was out of danger and recovering in hospital.

Rai told police in the city of Kent a man he did not know came up to him on Friday night and they got into an argument, with the suspect telling Rai to go back to his homeland. He described the shooter as 6ft and white with a stocky build, police said. He said the man was wearing a mask that covered the lower half of his face.

Kent police chief Ken Thomas said in an email on Sunday that no arrests had been made and that the FBI had agreed to help the department with the investigation.

The investigation comes after an Indian man was killed and another wounded in a recent shooting at a Kansas bar that federal agencies are investigating as a hate crime after witnesses said the suspect yelled get out of my country.

The Sikh Coalition, a national civil rights group, asked local and federal authorities to investigate the shooting in suburban Seattle as a hate crime.

Were early on in our investigation, Thomas told the Seattle Times. We are treating this as a very serious incident.

Kent police commander Jarod Kasner told told the News Tribune of Tacoma: With recent unrest and concern throughout the nation, this can get people emotionally involved, especially when [the crime] is directed at a person for how they live, how they look.

Hira Singh, a Sikh community leader in Kent, said the news was a shock to him. This kind of incident shakes up the whole community, he said.

Singh said there had been increasing complaints recently from Sikhs who say they have been the target of foul language or other comments. About 50,000 Sikhs live in Washington state, with most in the Puget Sound region, he said.

It was disheartening to see it happening here in my community, Satwinder Kaur said. Kent is a very diverse community. We havent seen a hate crime happening at this level.

Kaur said she had arranged for Kents police chief to talk to the community on Saturday about their concerns on immigration and the role of local police officers. After the shooting, the meeting turned into a question-and-answer session about the crime, she said.

When someone says get out of my country its a hate crime, theres no question, Kaur said. The community has been shaken up.

Sikhs were the target of assaults in the US after the 11 September 2001 attacks, as a backlash against Muslims expanded. In 2012, a man shot and killed six worshippers and wounded four others at a Sikh temple near Milwaukee, before killing himself.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/05/sikh-man-shot-kent-washington-gunman-country

Sikh Coalition wants case of man shot in arm investigated as hate crime

FBI to help investigation after victim of Washington state incident says man who shot him wore a mask and yelled at him to get out of my country

A Sikh man from the suburbs of Seattle said a gunman approached him as he worked on his car in his driveway and told him to go back to your own country, before shooting him in the arm, authorities said.

Indias foreign minister, Sushma Swaraj, identified the victim on Twitter early on Sunday, saying: I am sorry to know about the attack on Deep Rai, a US national of Indian origin.

She said she had spoken to Rais father, who told her Rai was out of danger and recovering in hospital.

Rai told police in the city of Kent a man he did not know came up to him on Friday night and they got into an argument, with the suspect telling Rai to go back to his homeland. He described the shooter as 6ft and white with a stocky build, police said. He said the man was wearing a mask that covered the lower half of his face.

Kent police chief Ken Thomas said in an email on Sunday that no arrests had been made and that the FBI had agreed to help the department with the investigation.

The investigation comes after an Indian man was killed and another wounded in a recent shooting at a Kansas bar that federal agencies are investigating as a hate crime after witnesses said the suspect yelled get out of my country.

The Sikh Coalition, a national civil rights group, asked local and federal authorities to investigate the shooting in suburban Seattle as a hate crime.

Were early on in our investigation, Thomas told the Seattle Times. We are treating this as a very serious incident.

Kent police commander Jarod Kasner told told the News Tribune of Tacoma: With recent unrest and concern throughout the nation, this can get people emotionally involved, especially when [the crime] is directed at a person for how they live, how they look.

Hira Singh, a Sikh community leader in Kent, said the news was a shock to him. This kind of incident shakes up the whole community, he said.

Singh said there had been increasing complaints recently from Sikhs who say they have been the target of foul language or other comments. About 50,000 Sikhs live in Washington state, with most in the Puget Sound region, he said.

It was disheartening to see it happening here in my community, Satwinder Kaur said. Kent is a very diverse community. We havent seen a hate crime happening at this level.

Kaur said she had arranged for Kents police chief to talk to the community on Saturday about their concerns on immigration and the role of local police officers. After the shooting, the meeting turned into a question-and-answer session about the crime, she said.

When someone says get out of my country its a hate crime, theres no question, Kaur said. The community has been shaken up.

Sikhs were the target of assaults in the US after the 11 September 2001 attacks, as a backlash against Muslims expanded. In 2012, a man shot and killed six worshippers and wounded four others at a Sikh temple near Milwaukee, before killing himself.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/05/sikh-man-shot-kent-washington-gunman-country

Betsy DeVos sparks ire by linking historically black colleges with ‘school choice’

Education secretary calls HBCUs real pioneers on conservative issue, despite fact that racist admissions policies elsewhere spurred institutions growth

Betsy DeVos, the controversial newly appointed secretary of education, is facing scorn on Capitol Hill and around the country after releasing a statement that compared the emergence of historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs), amid pervasive and overt racial exclusion, with the battle for school choice.

In a statement tied to a listening session with HBCU leaders, DeVos said HBCUs are living proof that when more options are provided to students, they are afforded greater access and greater quality.

HBCUs are real pioneers when it comes to school choice, the statement said.

DeVos appeared to by trying to make the point, popular with conservatives, that when schools operate in a marketplace, they tend to fill the otherwise unserved needs of students.

To many the intended argument didnt survive the contradiction of associating HBCUs, born out of necessity when black Americans were almost uniformly barred from existing universities by racist admittance policies, with the idea of choice.

Yesterdays attempt to whitewash the the stain of segregation into an argument for privatizing our public schools is perhaps a new low in her current position, said the Michigan congressman John Conyers, who also called the statement shocking and insulting.

Rep. Barbara Lee (@RepBarbaraLee)

Tone-deaf, uninformed statement from DeVos. #HBCUs werent more options for black students for many years, they were the ONLY option. pic.twitter.com/fD58rXpHIt

February 28, 2017

Major Beige (@MajorBeige)

DeVos saying HBCUs are examples of school choice is like saying the underground railroad is an example of social mobility.

February 28, 2017

The comparison was also awkward because the issue of school choice virtually always refers not to colleges but to K-12 education where, traditionally, students are assigned to a public school district according to their address.

School choice is at the foundation of DeVoss public education agenda. The billionaire education secretary, with no formal background in the field, has long been a proponent of allowing parents to opt out of public schools. Most experts in the field counter that school voucher systems and other similar programs tend to exacerbate the unequal distribution of educational resources. These schemes do nothing to help our most vulnerable students while they ignore or exacerbate glaring opportunity gaps, argued the National Education Association in November in reaction to her nomination by Donald Trump.

Nikole Hannah Jones, a reporter who has written extensively on school segregation, added that much of the contemporary conservative rhetoric about school choice is actually a function of the same racist, segregationist impulses that made HBCUs necessary in the 19th-century US. In many places in the country, the push for school choice has been pioneered by white parents seeking ways to remove their children from integrated or predominantly black public schools.

Ida Bae Wells (@nhannahjones)

HBCUs arose because white schools did not want, refused to enroll black students. School choice, vouchers, arose from EXACT same thing.

February 28, 2017

DeVoss statement comes, somewhat ironically, as Trump signs an executive order to relocate the White House Initiative on HBCUs, a program that has existed since 1980, to the White House. It had previously been administered by DeVoss Department of Education, but will now be led by an official who reports to a senior adviser to the president.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/28/betsy-devos-hbcus-school-choice-education-race

Trump’s election led to ‘barrage of hate’, report finds

Southern Poverty Law Center counts 867 hate incidents across US in 10 days since election, with many targeting immigrants, black Americans and Muslims

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has counted 867 hate incidents in the 10 days after the US election, a report released Tuesday found, a phenomenon it partly blamed on the rhetoric of Donald Trump.

The advocacy group collected reports of incidents from media outlets and its own #ReportHate page. SPLC said it was not able to confirm all reports but believed the number of actual incidents was far higher, as according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics most hate crimes go unreported.

Richard Cohen, SPLCs president, blamed the recent surge in hate crimes on Trump and his divisive language throughout the campaign.

Mr Trump claims hes surprised his election has unleashed a barrage of hate across the country, said Cohen in a statement on Tuesday. But he shouldnt be. Its the predictable result of the campaign he waged. Rather than feign surprise, Mr Trump should take responsibility for whats occurring, forcefully reject hate and bigotry, reach out to the communities hes injured, and follow his words with actions to heal the wounds his words have opened.

Trumps name or one of his slogans was directly invoked in several instances. SPLC categorized 43 recorded incidents as Trump-General, where attackers used Trumps name but it was unclear what bias motivated the attack.

The appointment of Steve Bannon as Trumps chief White House strategist has proven controversial, due to his record of promoting antisemitic, anti-Muslim and misogynistic content while overseeing the alt-right website Breitbart News.

In an interview with 60 Minutes shortly after his victory, Trump claimed that he was surprised to hear about the increase in hate crimes since his election, many of which were perpetrated by his supporters. He looked squarely at the camera and told his supporters Stop it! during the interview.

According to the reports findings, anti-black and anti-immigrant incidents were the most commonly reported, with K-12 settings and colleges the most common venues.

Nearly a third of the incidents (289 of them) were motivated by anti-immigrant sentiment, the report said. Assailants often invoked Trumps promise to build a wall in their attacks and called for the victims to be deported. For instance, in Redding, California, a student brought deportation letters to school and recorded himself handing them out to Latino students. In Royal Oak, Michigan, students chanted build the wall in a school cafeteria the day after the election.

SPLC released a separate report on Tuesday detailing the impact of the election on schools.

Anti-black incidents were the second-most common, making up 23%, or 180, of the total. References to lynching were frequent, and pictures of nooses were used for intimidation. For instance, a black doll was found hanging from a noose in an elevator at New Yorks Canisius College.

In a school in Orlando, students wrote Yall Black ppl better start picking yall slave numbers. KKK. 4Lyfe. followed by the line Go Trump. 2016.

Antisemitic and anti-Muslim attacks were also common. SPLC documented 80 reports of vandalism and graffiti incidents of swastikas, without specific references to Jews. In New York, a swastika was found spray-painted on a sidewalk in a Jewish neighborhood. Muslims had been generally characterized as terrorists, while Muslim women wearing hijabs were particularly vulnerable to threats and assault, the report said.

A letter threatening genocide against Muslims and praising Trump was sent to several mosques over the weekend, outside the period included in the report, the Council of American and Islamic Relations said. Theres a new sheriff in town President Donald Trump, the letter reportedly said. Hes going to cleanse America and make it shine again. And, hes going to start with you Muslims.

SPLC also found 23 incidents of anti-Trump hate, which included attacks on the Trump campaign headquarters or people targeted for wearing paraphernalia such as Trump hats or shirts. For instance, the report said a man in New York City wearing a Trump hat was reportedly grabbed around the neck while riding the subway.

Have you experienced a rise in abuse since Trumps win?

As this is a sensitive topic, please be reassured that we will not share or publish any personal details without obtaining contributors permission first.

https://guardiannewsampampmedia.formstack.com/forms/js.php/gender__millennials_copy_copy_copy

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/nov/29/trump-related-hate-crimes-report-southern-poverty-law-center

No Asians, no blacks. Why do gay people tolerate such blatant racism? | Owen Jones

Most LGBT ethnic minorities say theyve faced discrimination, and bigotry on dating sites is a throwback to the 50s. The LGBT community must address this

Racism is a serious problem within the LGBT community and needs to be addressed. Despite the determination of many minority ethnic LGBT people to do just that, it is not happening. How can I be a bigot when I am myself a member of an oppressed minority? is a prevailing attitude among some white LGBT people. But another far more pernicious reason is that the LGBT world revolves around white gay men to the exclusion of others. The rainbow flag is whiter than it appears.

Im sexualised for my skin tone and never treated as a person, Saif tells me. The community is trained to accept a white, masc, muscled gay man and the rest of us are not really accepted or one of their own. Its not the individual he blames, but being conditioned by a community that venerates the sexual image of a white gay man. According to research by FS magazine, an astonishing 80% of black men, 79% of Asian men and 75% of south Asian men have experienced racism on the gay scene.

This manifests itself in numerous ways. Some are rejected because of their ethnicity; on the other hand, some are objectified because of it. On dating sites and apps, profiles abound that say no Asians or no black people, casually excluding entire ethnic groups. Its like a bastardised No dogs, no blacks, no Irish signs, as Anthony Lorenzo puts it.

On apps like Grindr, writes Matthew Rodriguez, gay men brandish their racial dating preferences with all the same unapologetic bravado that straight men reserve for their favourite baseball team.

Homi tells me he has Persian ancestry, and is sometimes mistaken for being Greek, Italian, Spanish, etc. Once, at a nightclub, he was relentlessly pursued by a fellow patron. Eventually, he was asked: Where are you from? When Homi answered India, the man was horrified. Im so sorry I dont do Indians! Indians are not my type.

And it is not simply a western phenomenon. Luan, a Brazilian journalist, tells me his country has a Eurocentric image of beauty and there is a cult of the white man, which is absurd, given more than half the population is black or brown. Others speak of their experiences of being rejected by door staff at LGBT venues. Michel, a south Asian man, tells me of being turned away because you dont look gay, and being called a dirty Paki. He says it has got worse since the Orlando nightclub massacre, where the gunman was Muslim.

And then theres the other side of the equation: objectification. Malik tells about his experiences of what he describes as the near fetishisation of race. The rejection of people based on ethnicity is bad enough, he says, but it can be just as gross when someone reduces you to your ethnicity, without consent, when dating/hooking up. His Arab heritage was objectified and stereotyped by some would-be lovers, even down to presuming his sexual role.

When the Royal Vauxhall Tavern a famed London LGBT venue hosted a blackface drag act, Chardine Taylor-Stone launched the Stop Rainbow Racism campaign. The drag act featured exaggerated neck rolling, finger snapping displays of sassiness, bad weaves and other racial stereotypes, she says. After launching a petition against the event, she received threats of violence. White LGBTQs who are truly against racism need to step up and take ownership of what is happening in their community, she writes.

LGBT publications are guilty too. Historically, theyve been dominated by white men, have neglected issues of race, and have portrayed white men as objects of beauty. Dean stopped buying mainstream gay magazines two years ago. The only time they would write about people of colour is when they had done something homophobic, he says. The gay media is completely whitewashed.

There has been positive change in recent months, one leading black gay journalist tells me, but only because of the work of ethnic minority LGBT individuals holding magazines to account, setting up their own nights across the scene and using social media, blogs, podcasts and boycotts to force change.

While LGBT people are much more likely than heterosexuals to suffer from mental distress, the level is even higher among ethnic minorities. Undoubtedly, racism plays a role. As Rodriguez puts it, seeing dating app profiles rejecting entire ethnic groups causes internalised racism, decreased self-esteem and psychological distress.

Many of the rights and freedoms that all LGBT people won were down to the struggles of black and minority ethnic people: at the Stonewall riots, for example, non-white protesters. The least that white LGBT people can do is to reciprocate and confront racism within their own ranks. Shangela, an actor, tells me that racism from the LGBT community hurts more because its coming from people that Im meant to share a kinship with.

The far-right movements on the march across the western world are consciously trying to co-opt the LGBT rights campaign for their own agenda. Muslims are portrayed as an existential threat to gay people, particularly after Orlando. There are those who only talk about LGBT rights if it is to bash Muslims or migrants as a whole. American white nationalist websites now sell LGBT pride flags along with the Confederate flag. This week, Milo Yiannopolous a gay attention-seeker who has become an icon of the US far right was at the centre of a media storm because a platform to speak at his old school was withdrawn. In the Netherlands, the anti-immigrant right was led by a gay man, Pim Fortuyn, until his assassination. In France, reportedly a third of married gay couples support the far-right National Front.

The struggle against racism has, of course, to be led by people of colour who suffer the consequences such as Black Out UK, which fights for a platform for black gay men, and Media Diversified, which campaigns for minority representation in the media. But unless white LGBT people who the official gay scene venerates listen to the voices of those who are sidelined, little will change.

Being oppressed yourself does not mean you are incapable of oppressing others: far from it. LGBT people have had to struggle against bigotry and oppression for generations. It is tragic that they inflict and ignore injustice in their own ranks.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/24/no-asians-no-blacks-gay-people-racism

Drawing the line on the most gerrymandered district in America

The supreme court will review the long-running battle over line-drawing, but many fear that voters voices may be washed out in the presidential race first

On the outskirts of Charlotte, its the last day of early voting for the congressional race in North Carolinas 12th district at the Mountain Island library, and there are no lines for the polling stations.

Instead, volunteers outnumbered the voters. It was early voting time, but not for a race nearly as high-profile as the presidential election. Only 266 people turned out in June to the polls to pick the districts next member of Congress. After the election, once all the votes were tallied, only 7% of more than 500,000 registered voters cast ballots.

Turnout was very, very low, said Carol Johnson, a poll worker and an employee for the city of Charlotte. Maybe people didnt know. Maybe they werent interested.

Or maybe people have grown disenfranchised after living in what has long been considered the most gerrymandered district in the United States. Twenty-five years ago, North Carolina lawmakers drew the 12th district, creating the second majority-minority district in a state with a dark history of denying black residents their voting rights.

That line-drawing is what is known as gerrymandering, or manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts to favor a particular result.

The districts borders were long and narrow so stretched out that it took a two-hour drive from Charlotte, passing through Winston-Salem and Greensboro, before ending in Durham. Naturally, it became known as the I-85 district because, as state representative Mickey Michaux, a Democrat from Durham, once put it: If you drove down the interstate with both car doors open, youd kill most of the people in the district.

What gerrymandering can kill is the impact of a persons vote. North Carolina is a prime example of why Barack Obama and former US attorney general Eric Holder recently announced plans to launch a long-term redistricting reform effort. And after Donald Trump escalated his warnings that this years presidential election is rigged, several commentators and even the Daily Shows Trevor Noah argued that gerrymandering along with voter suppression laws are the real rigging.

The states past two presidential races were determined by a margin of two percentage points, yet the simple act of map-drawing distorted electoral outcomes on the ballot. Two years ago, more than half the states voters cast Democratic ballots, yet Republicans secured the vast majority of congressional seats. For proof of gerrymanderings chilling effects, look no further than the way that the 12th which over the years has been described as a serpentine, political pornography and nothing natural on this planet has undercut the power of a single vote.

Party control of line-drawing
Party control of line-drawing

Opponents of gerrymandering fear the voices of voters may be washed out in the upcoming presidential election, even as statewide restrictions that have been intensively litigated pose potentially more direct obstacles to voting.

This coming term, the US supreme court will review the long-running battle over line-drawing.

An uncomfortable resemblance to political apartheid

The most gerrymandered district emerged after years of battles against discriminatory voting practices. In the decades after the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 outlawed voting restrictions such as literacy tests, voting rights lawyers continued to challenge discriminatory election practices still on the books in southern states forcing changes to ensure their compliance with the Voting Rights Act.

Over the course of several decades, North Carolinas population grew enough to gain a 12th congressional seat following the 1990 census. The 12th, the states second majority-minority district, was intended to boost minority representation.

Mel Watt, a black Charlotte-based lawyer and political operative, seized on the opportunity. He had helped Harvey Gantt get elected as Charlottes first black mayor in the early 80s.

I got on the phone to call Harvey, hoping to persuade him to run, Watt recalls. He said, Im not going to run. He instead talked me into running.

Watt won in 1992, and then more than 10 times after that in the majority black district. But during his tenure, the US supreme court took issue with the districts consideration of race in its line-drawing numerous times.

In 1993, then Justice Sandra Day OConnor said districts such as the 12th which was drawn by the Democratic-led house bore an uncomfortable resemblance to political apartheid that reinforced the very patterns of racial bloc voting that majority-minority districting is sometimes said to counteract.

North Carolina soon found itself in a bind: it needed to ensure black votes actually mattered, all while drawing districts without explicitly having race in mind. The supreme courts Shaw v Reno ruling sparked lawsuits that challenged the constitutionality of majority-minority districts in Georgia, Texas, Florida and Louisiana. The 12th districts map had to be redrawn repeatedly, a total of four times, through 2010.

Election be decided

Battle of the partisan lines

By the time of the 2010 census, Republicans had taken over the statehouse and soon after reworked the congressional district maps to increase the likelihood that its candidates would secure more seats. As the districts changed, North Carolina lawmakers also passed new restrictions that prohibited voters from registering on election day and required IDs to cast ballots. The US supreme court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, further gutting election laws in the Tar Heel State.

With new GOP-drawn borders, Republicans in 2012 won nine of the states 13 congressional seats even though Democrats cast more votes statewide. Two years later, Republicans picked up an additional seat despite the fact more Democrats were registered to vote.

The Rev William Barber, the preacher behind the left-leaning Moral Monday movement, criticized the GOP-backed plan for containing apartheid voting districts that were designed to disenfranchise African-American voters. Apartheid is not the way for our representatives to be elected, said civil rights lawyer Adam Stein earlier this year at an NAACP press conference. North Carolina citizens have been put into districts because of their race rather than where they live.

There had long been calls to remove politics from the redistricting process. Last year three state lawmakers a Democrat and two Republicans dropped separate bills that were ultimately unsuccessful. State representative Jeff Jackson, a Democrat and the author of one of those measures, says he nearly copied word-for-word an old Republican bill from its days as the minority party but to no avail.

Its like monkeys throwing darts, Jackson says of the current process. Virtually any system of redistricting would be far superior than what North Carolina has now.

If passed, Jacksons proposal would have established an impartial nine-person commission tasked with drawing maps starting in 2030. But Daniel Rufty, chairman of North Carolinas Republican party in the 12th district, considers independent redistricting to be a nave idea. Whatever changes, whenever the changes happen, he says a new method of map drawing would still require appointees to oversee the process. Who will be appointing those individuals? Partisan officials.

The 12th district doesnt make sense, Rufty says. It was drawn for partisan reasons that, like it or not, are constitutional. I dont exactly like it like that. But it is what it is.

All the shapes of the 12th district
All the shapes of the 12th district

For now, the 12th district is no longer gerrymandered. A federal court tossed out the map in February as it pointed to evidence that race was the only nonnegotiable criterion used in drawing the district borders, and the legislature has since redrawn the district.

But while the 12th is more compact, black people no longer account for the majority of registered voters like they once did.

Several residents appealed to challenge the court ruling. Now the issue which threw some congressional primaries into chaos this past June has landed on the US supreme courts fall docket. Lawyers challenging the lower courts decision argue the judges made their decision based on political affiliation rather than just race.

It remains undisputed that there is a very high correlation between African American voters and voters who regularly vote a straight Democratic ticket and support national Democratic candidates, the lawyer says.

If the US supreme court overturns the rulings, its likely that lawmakers would need to redraw the 12ths maps yet again. No matter the ruling, though, the effects of a quarter-century of gerrymandering in the 12th wont be undone overnight. Michael Dickerson, director of the Mecklenburg County board of elections, said that only 37,400 people of 520,000 registered voters cast ballots in the states last election the postponed June congressional primary.

Congresswoman
Congresswoman Alma Adams canvasses a Charlotte neighborhood on the final day of early voting before the 12th district primary. Photograph: Max Blau

Congresswoman Alma Adams, who represents the 12th, won a heated primary with six other candidates. But if the incumbent Democrat gets re-elected next month which is likely since Democrats outnumber Republicans there by a two-to-one margin she will have done so with just 2% of total registered voters. She concedes winning that way, though beneficial to her, is a disservice to the wider district.

Without broader redistricting reform, she says, the lasting effects of gerrymandering could continue to dissuade constituents from casting ballots.

People get discouraged, Adams said. They dont bother to vote.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/19/gerrymandering-supreme-court-us-election-north-carolina

Bonnie Greer: ‘Black Lives Matter is a big fail for my generation’

The writer has reimagined The Cherry Orchard as The Hotel Cerise, replacing Russian aristocrats with African Americans. She talks about fleeing gentrification, how millennials are going to save us and why she never watches herself on TV

Bonnie Greer tells me, with pride, that she doesnt really engage much with contemporary culture. Or, more accurately, she doesnt remember much once its been and gone, doesnt watch TV, and doesnt go out in the evenings. I spend most of my day alone, she says, and I never go anywhere. Nope. She doesnt recognise the actors who occasionally approach her in the street and she hates dinner parties, because she cant stand the chat.

Im a curious person, the critic and writer says, several times. I spent half my life apologising for wanting to go to the Royal Opera House not a blues or jazz club. She began reading Ibsen and Chekhov a couple of years ago, after taking what sounds like a Myers-Briggs personality test, which told her: I didnt really know who I was.

She took to the Russian writers with brio and were meeting today in a busy London restaurant to discuss her new adaptation of The Cherry Orchard, which she has reimagined and relocated to a bougie, black, middle-class retreat in Michigan called The Hotel Cerise. Although a contemporary African American family takes the place of Russian aristocrats at the dawn of the 20th century, Greer insists The Hotel Cerise is not a black version of Chekhov.

Actors
Actors in rehearsal for The Hotel Cerise from left. Abhin Galeya, Madeline Appiah and Lacharne Jolly. Photograph: Stephen Cummiskey

Defining it that way, she explains, feels reductive: the point is to show how the mechanics of Chekhovs writing can be easily bent to accommodate an inclusive perspective on love, loss and the rest. When I wake up in the morning, she explains, Im just myself. Its only when I leave the front door that I become a black woman to the world.

Greer, now aged 68, was born in Chicago, the eldest of seven siblings to a mother run ragged looking after them all, and a father who worked in a factory and was stationed in Britain during the second world war. She moved to the UK in 1986 to work in the arts and has defined herself as a playwright ever since, with works including Munda Negra (1993) and Jitterbug (2001). She writes all day, often till 3am, and is still finishing The Hotel Cerise when we meet.

She married her husband, a solicitor, in 1993 and they lived near Notting Hill for over a decade. We had to move because I couldnt stand what the area had become couldnt stand it. She repeats this four times. I couldnt stand the bankers, the gentrification. The couple moved to Soho, a prohibitively expensive area that has itself been undergoing a (much-protested) gentrification for some years now. But what I get to see is passing traffic! says Greer. Theres still different kinds of people coming through, its more cosmopolitan.

Bonnie
Bonnie Greer, far left, attends rehearsals. Photograph: Stephen Cummiskey

Greer is barely five feet, but projects a grand and glamorous life: she has often been the go-to voice called upon to represent minority women on TV and radio, she has sat on the boards of the British Museum, the Royal Opera House, Theatre Royal Stratford East, was appointed an OBE in 2010 and is now the chancellor of Kingston University. For a couple of years, she wrote a weekly culture column for the Mail on Sunday, dotted with dispatches from parties and premieres.

Thats not really me, she explains. I spent most of my life sleeping on couches. I move in that world, but Im not of it. When I first came here 30 years ago, it was shocking to me that people would talk about black British people in front of me, they were dismissive and would trivialise things because I was from America.

She became a British citizen almost 20 years ago but, I guess, probably quite enjoys often being the only black person in the room. Yeah, she says. I tell you why: because it alters the space. It changes things up and I tell black women all the time, Dont apologise for yourself and keep your hair nappy whatever that means to you. Never apologise, make sure you are heard.

And Greer is certainly heard: she has a beautiful voice, perfectly paced mellifluous honey that goes a long way to distract from the fact that she often speaks in tangents and non-sequiturs. Conversation zips along, taking in her obsession with the Obamas and the art of waitressing, to the trouble with Theresa May and the faith she has in the young.

Millennials
Millennials will save us Bonnie Greer in London. Photograph: David Levene for the Guardian

Millennials, I think, are gonna save us if they can get jobs and keep their body and souls together. I see a lot of repetition of my own life experience, seeing things come back again. Like what? Black Lives Matter is a rerun. Its a replay of what we did as student activists in the 60s, the Black Panthers. I understand it because Ive been through it and seen it.

Does the fact that #BLM even exists not represent a failure on the part of her generation? Oh yes, a big fail. Big fail. People of my generation did what everyone does. People get tired, say, I want to have some kids, a roof over my head and a paycheque. I never did that, but I dont blame my friends who did.

Strangely, for someone who made her name on television review shows, Greer claims to have never watched herself on TV I became a critic because I have a big mouth and opinions not even the notorious Question Time from 2009, when she appeared with Nick Griffin, then leader of the BNP. Ive never watched it, she says. Yet she wrote Yes for the Royal Opera House based on the experience? I remembered my emotions sitting there, though. I remembered my feelings, the nerves up to it, the pressure.

She also considers herself to have low self-esteem, but is such good, garrulous company, I can only assume shes joking. Im extremely shy, she insists. Oh, come on, Bonnie! I tell her I dont believe her: we are running at more than double the allotted interview time at this point and she hasnt had a chance to eat more than three bites of her lunch mushroom burger, fries and Im not even a quarter of the way through my questions.

Why would I lie to you? she says. When are you shy? Im always shy. In what situation? In every situation.

At this precise moment, she spots the plays publicist and waves her over with a huge, emphatically warm: Hi! They chat briefly, as Greers lunch is sent back to the kitchen to be reheated. I tell her its a shame she dislikes socialising: she seems born to it. Oh, never. People think its personal. With you Im having a ball because youre real, most people She pauses while rummaging around for a level of diplomacy. Most people operate from personas. Im fascinated by personas.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2016/oct/19/bonnie-greer-black-lives-matter-hotel-cerise-interview

H&Ms diverse advert mirrors the real world. Shame the ad industry doesnt | Arwa Mahdawi

All types of women feature in the TV ad, but are campaigns such as this having any effect on the industry that creates them?

Diversity is so hot right now. Take H&Ms new television advert for its autumn/winter 2016 collection, for example, which features a range of women including:

Black women with natural hair

Women with shaved heads

A muscular woman

Action shots of womens wobbly bits wobbling

A thin woman eating french fries without a side of guilt

Armpit hair

A septuagenarian

An ethnically ambiguous high-powered female business executive

A trans woman

Lesbians

In short, the ad features Normal Women doing Normal Things: the sort of people you see on the train on your way to work, the sort of people you are friends with and the sort of people who shop at H&M.

You may even see someone on screen that you, a modern woman in a multicultural world, can identify with! Which, of course, is the point. The campaign, which is set to an updated version of Tom Joness Shes a Lady, aims to modernise notions of ladylike behaviour. There are so many unique ways to be a lady today, the ad is saying, and theyre all amazing. Feel empowered to celebrate your individuality in identical H&M clothes!

Cynicism aside, this ad is brilliant. A multinational brand putting major marketing money into celebrating the sort of women that you dont often see celebrated onscreen is incredibly powerful. Ironically, though, its powerful only because both fashion and advertising have spent so long reinforcing the idea that femininity looks a certain way in the first place. That default woman is straight, thin and white, and has the right amount of hair in the right places.

Rules for the Modern Woman

But with demographics shifting and society changing, people are pushing back against this sort of monolithic image of femininity. Marketers are only too aware of this. That is their job, after all. They spend a lot of money doing consumer research that says things like: Todays millennial female doesnt relate to images of skinny white women eating yoghurt while simultaneously doing yoga and the laundry. And so they change their advertising accordingly.

Real Morning Report

H&M is far from the only brand to be celebrating modern women. Netflix, for example, recently launched a campaign called Rules for the Modern Woman, which mocks old-fashioned notions of how women should behave. Similarly, Organic Valley unveiled the Real Women Report, an ad making fun of the disconnect between womens perfect lives as portrayed by adverts versus womens real lives.

FREDDY (@FreddyAmazin) February 15, 2016

adidas is so amazing for this pic.twitter.com/VO4x4CHYRC

Advertising isnt just updating its views on women. Earlier this year Old Navy caused controversy for putting a mixed-race family in one of its ads three years after Cheerios caused major backlash for doing the same. (Yes, in case you were wondering, it is actually 2016 and some people do think that showing a mixed-race couple doing crazy things like eating breakfast or wearing T-shirts is anti-white propaganda.)

Adidas prompted similar backlash when it showed a same-sex couple in a Valentines Day Instagram post. But these brands bravely stood their ground because it was the Right Thing to Do. And also, one imagines, because theyd already found that these ads tested well with their core consumers, would boost their brand image and maybe win them an industry award. Move over, Malala: let Madison Avenue show you how activism is done.

Diversity on screen is one thing, but does it have any knock-on effect off screen? Have Benetton ads led to Benetton boardrooms?

Take the advertising industry itself, for example. While creating big, anthemic ads celebrating diversity may be en vogue, doing the hard work of actually making the industry more equitable is not quite as fashionable. I know three female advertising executives who have left jobs at major ad agencies in the last year because of sexual harassment or discrimination. One senior advertising strategist I know was referred to as good dog by her boss, and was repeatedly told not to be too confrontational.

But things are slowly changing. Earlier this year Gustavo Martinez, the global chief executive of the advertising agency J Walter Thompson left his role amid allegations that he called black people monkeys, said he hate[s] those fucking Jews, and made rape jokes. Harmless advertising banter, you know? Martinez and the agency denied the claims but it still proved toxic enough to end their relationship. And Kevin Roberts, executive chairman of Saatchi and Saatchi was recently suspended and later resigned after making comments about women in leadership roles. Im not sure that would have happened a few years ago.

A focus on diversity on-screen is helping to drive a conversation and real change when it comes to diversity off-screen. Lets just hope it stays in fashion beyond autumn/winter 2016.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/28/hm-advert-diversity-ad-women